Keyword summary
55% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,881 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tobacco results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 999 hits . Analysis detected 13,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,232 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,997 of 37,536 keywords). This Tobacco is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group. Tobacco
Keyword details
Total words: 15,232
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst