Keyword summary
92% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,057 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Timberwolves results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 324 hits . Analysis detected 3,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,171 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,505 of 37,536 keywords). This Timberwolves is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Timberwolves
Keyword details
Total words: 3,171
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst