Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Tea Spilled results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 1,528 hits . Analysis detected 6,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,211 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,235 of 35,444 keywords). This The Tea Spilled is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. The Tea Spilled
Keyword details
Total words: 5,211
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.1% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.2% 23.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 29.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst