Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Bahamas results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 422 hits . Analysis detected 2,699 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,446 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,448 of 37,536 keywords). This The Bahamas is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. The Bahamas
Keyword details
Total words: 3,446
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst