Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texaschainsawmassacre results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and In-Group Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 55.6% saturation with 523 hits. Analysis detected 2,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,277 of 37,536 keywords). This Texaschainsawmassacre is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
Texaschainsawmassacre
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
94%Texaschainsawmassacre (selected)10%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 940
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

94% percentile
025507510093.9% percentile
9.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles940 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 55.6%55.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 22.2%22.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 27.3%27.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 15.1%15.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 55.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 27.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos