Daily Kos⁠84%

Tom the Dancing Bug: Elon Musk and DOGE pals in ‘Texas Chainsaw Massacre’ ⁠89%

By RubenBolling⁠0%

6/25/2026, 5:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 49.8% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 746 faulty-reasoning hits from 235 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (2,436 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the article peer group.

Tom the Dancing Bug: Elon Musk and DOGE pals in ‘Texas Chainsaw Massacre’ 
* Please join the team that makes it possible for your friendly neighborhood comic strip Tom the Dancing Bug to exist in this hostile Trumpverse! 
JOIN US IN **THE INNER HIVE**, and be the first kid on your block to get each week's Tom the Dancing Bug comic – before it's published anywhere. 
* Sign up for the free weekly newsletter, **The Tom the Dancing Bug Review**! 
Not nearly as good as joining the Inner Hive, but it's free! 
* Get yer Tom the Dancing Bug books! 
**The Complete Tom the Dancing Bug Library** — get one, two or all eight volumes. 
* Follow @RubenBolling on **Bluesky** and/or **Mastodon** and/or **Threads** and/or **Facebook** and/or **Instagram** and/or **Reddit**. 
**Related | Musk would rather sue than hear about how many kids he’s killed 
We'll get straight to the point: The financial hardships that Daily Kos is facing this year are tough. 
We continue to be paywall-free. 
We continue to be supported by our readers, not billionaires or corporations. 
But we need to bring in more revenue. 
We are leaning on our community more than ever to help make ends meet. 
Was this story worth reading? 
Recommending and sharing stories helps us decide which stories are most important to show our readers. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.8%RubenBolling: 1.1%Daily Kos: 5.7%Confirmation Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%RubenBolling: 2.9%Daily Kos: 3.3%Availability Heuristic6.4%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 41.3%RubenBolling: 13.8%Daily Kos: 8.9%Framing Effect41.3%This article: 8.5%RubenBolling: 2.3%Daily Kos: 0.6%Loss Aversion8.5%This article: 2.1%RubenBolling: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.3%Status Quo Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%RubenBolling: 3.6%Daily Kos: 2.0%Pessimism Bias7.7%This article: 27.7%RubenBolling: 8.9%Daily Kos: 15.4%Negativity Bias27.7%This article: 14.0%RubenBolling: 2.2%Daily Kos: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias14.0%This article: 3.4%RubenBolling: 0.5%Daily Kos: 2.6%Fundamental Attribution Error3.4%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 21.7%RubenBolling: 14.6%Daily Kos: 2.1%In-Group Bias21.7%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.8%Daily Kos: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.3%Daily Kos: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%RubenBolling: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%RubenBolling: 5.5%Daily Kos: 5.8%Ad Hominem6.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 3.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 10.2%RubenBolling: 3.2%Daily Kos: 2.3%False Dilemma10.2%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 6.8%RubenBolling: 1.1%Daily Kos: 0.2%Circular Reasoning6.8%This article: 7.7%RubenBolling: 2.1%Daily Kos: 9.8%Hasty Generalization7.7%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 11.9%RubenBolling: 4.8%Daily Kos: 0.6%Bandwagon11.9%This article: 33.6%RubenBolling: 28.0%Daily Kos: 7.3%Appeal to Emotion33.6%This article: 12.8%RubenBolling: 2.0%Daily Kos: 1.9%Begging the Question12.8%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 15.3%RubenBolling: 2.4%Daily Kos: 0.8%Burden of Proof15.3%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 2.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 11.1%RubenBolling: 3.6%Daily Kos: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection11.1%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 4.9%Daily Kos: 23.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 10.6%RubenBolling: 23.2%Daily Kos: 2.1%Indoctrination10.6%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 15.9%Daily Kos: 10.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%RubenBolling: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 49.8%RubenBolling: 58.9%Daily Kos: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…49.8%

235 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker6.4%attributed speech220writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageRubenBolling • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

RubenBolling

100%flagged-word coverage
15 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +53.6 ptsWriter: 46.4%RubenBolling: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection-11.8 ptsWriter: 11.8%RubenBolling: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-11.4 ptsWriter: 11.4%RubenBolling: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.