Keyword summary
â 33% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Public Policy Foundation results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 680 hits . Analysis detected 3,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,322 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of â 4% (36,340 of 37,536 keywords). This Texas Public Policy Foundation is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Texas Public Policy Foundation
Keyword details
Total words: 8,322
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst