Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Gop results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Begging the Question, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 1,390 hits. Analysis detected 12,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,888 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (19,572 of 35,189 keywords). This Texas Gop is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Texas Gop
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
45%Texas Gop (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,888
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 14.1%14.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate