Keyword summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,507 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Democrats results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 903 hits . Analysis detected 6,540 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,275 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 63% (14,227 of 37,536 keywords). This Texas Democrats is worse (more manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group. Texas Democrats
Keyword details
Total words: 5,275
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.1% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Red Herring: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst