Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Dad Crushed Death Tree results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hindsight Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 549 hits . Analysis detected 2,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,552 of 37,306 keywords). This Texas Dad Crushed Death Tree is worse (more manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group. Texas Dad Crushed Death Tree
Keyword details
Total words: 2,528
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.4% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 21.7% 21.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Straw Man: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst