Keyword summary
41%2 analyzed articles/videos1,661 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 601 hits. Analysis detected 4,308 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,249 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,199 of 37,536 keywords). This Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 6,249
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510019.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate