Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texans results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 617 hits. Analysis detected 3,742 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,880 of 37,536 keywords). This Texans is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Texans
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
66%Texans (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,788
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510065.7% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos