Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video679 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Territorial Dispute results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,597 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,067 of 37,536 keywords). This Territorial Dispute is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group.
Territorial Dispute
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
31%Territorial Dispute (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510030.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos