Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Teen Killer results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 1,293 hits . Analysis detected 4,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,637 keywords). This Teen Killer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Teen Killer
Keyword details
Total words: 6,288
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 20.6% 20.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst