Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,296 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Disruption results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 1,212 hits . Analysis detected 5,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,196 of 37,536 keywords). This Technology Disruption is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group. Technology Disruption
Keyword details
Total words: 5,184
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 23.4% 23.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 19.2% 19.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst