Keyword summary
89%4 analyzed articles/videos1,459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Stocks results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 678 hits. Analysis detected 8,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,163 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,332 of 36,379 keywords). This Tech Stocks is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Tech Stocks
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
72%Tech Stocks (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,163
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
4.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate