Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 255 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Investors results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.6% saturation with 404 hits . Analysis detected 2,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,931 of 37,536 keywords). This Tech Investors is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Tech Investors
Keyword details
Total words: 1,020
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.9% percentile 10.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 31.1% 31.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 25.2% 25.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 17.3% 17.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 39.6% 39.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 39.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 31.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 25.2%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst