Keyword summary
32% 3 analyzed articles/videos 528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Credits results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 997 hits . Analysis detected 8,624 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,705 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,210 of 37,536 keywords). This Tax Credits is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Tax Credits
Keyword details
Total words: 9,705
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst