Keyword summary
36% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tattoos results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 769 hits . Analysis detected 8,967 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,365 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,384 of 37,533 keywords). This Tattoos is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group. Tattoos
Keyword details
Total words: 13,365
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst