Keyword summary
50% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,616 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tartan Army results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 1,429 hits . Analysis detected 9,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,697 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (19,888 of 37,536 keywords). This Tartan Army is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group. Tartan Army
Keyword details
Total words: 8,697
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst