Keyword summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tariff Refunds results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 765 hits . Analysis detected 8,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,461 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (32,137 of 36,408 keywords). This Tariff Refunds is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. Tariff Refunds
Keyword details
Total words: 13,461
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst