Keyword summary
12%2 analyzed articles/videos1,786 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Target Soccer Union Soccer Soccer results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 853 hits. Analysis detected 3,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,929 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,560 of 37,536 keywords). This Target Soccer Union Soccer Soccer is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Target Soccer Union Soccer Soccer
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,929
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

27% percentile
025507510026.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 14.4%14.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate