Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 331 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Target Field Station results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 43.5% saturation with 432 hits . Analysis detected 1,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 993 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,560 of 37,536 keywords). This Target Field Station is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Target Field Station
Keyword details
Total words: 993
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.2% percentile 8.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles993 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 22.4% 22.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 43.5% 43.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 30.9% 30.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 43.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 30.9%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 19.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 22.4%, sitewide 2.5% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.7% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst