Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,464 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tanlines results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 1,167 hits . Analysis detected 5,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,950 of 37,536 keywords). This Tanlines is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. Tanlines
Keyword details
Total words: 5,856
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.9% 19.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst