Keyword summary
17% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,618 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tampa Bay results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 992 hits . Analysis detected 5,951 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,818 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (30,400 of 35,865 keywords). This Tampa Bay is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Tampa Bay
Keyword details
Total words: 9,818
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst