Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tamales Elena Y Antojitos results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 724 hits. Analysis detected 8,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,119 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (5,351 of 37,536 keywords). This Tamales Elena Y Antojitos is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Tamales Elena Y Antojitos
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠86%Tamales Elena Y Antojitos (selected)6%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,119
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510085.7% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 9.9%9.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 7.0%7.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos