Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tae Technologies results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 56.7% saturation with 917 hits . Analysis detected 5,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,617 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.3% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,491 of 37,536 keywords). This Tae Technologies is worse (more manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group. Tae Technologies
Keyword details
Total words: 1,617
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.0% percentile 11.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 46.8% 46.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 56.7% 56.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 28.0% 28.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 18.4% 18.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 23.6% 23.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 56.7%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 46.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 28.0%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 23.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 6.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Composition/Division: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.3% Red Herring: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst