Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tae Technologies results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 56.7% saturation with 917 hits. Analysis detected 5,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,617 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.3% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,491 of 37,536 keywords). This Tae Technologies is worse (more manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group.
Tae Technologies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
96%Tae Technologies (selected)12%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,617
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

96% percentile
025507510096.0% percentile
11.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 46.8%46.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 56.7%56.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 28.0%28.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 17.7%17.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 18.4%18.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 23.6%23.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 56.7%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 46.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 28.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 23.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.3%Red Herring: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos