Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Syrians results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,620 hits . Analysis detected 10,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,440 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (29,516 of 37,536 keywords). This Syrians is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Syrians
Keyword details
Total words: 12,440
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst