Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Swing Shift Project results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Slippery Slope, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 2,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (18,951 of 37,536 keywords). This Swing Shift Project is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Swing Shift Project
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠50%Swing Shift Project (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos