Keyword summary
32%2 analyzed articles/videos1,465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Swing Districts results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 767 hits. Analysis detected 6,628 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,643 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,167 of 37,536 keywords). This Swing Districts is better (less manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Swing Districts
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
15%Swing Districts (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,643
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510014.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos