Keyword summary
33%1 analyzed article/video1,119 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Swat results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 2,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,357 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,079 of 37,536 keywords). This Swat is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Swat
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
28%Swat (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,357
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510027.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos