Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 839 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supply Side Economics results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.3% saturation with 1,065 hits . Analysis detected 6,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,517 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,335 of 37,536 keywords). This Supply Side Economics is worse (more manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Supply Side Economics
Keyword details
Total words: 2,517
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.8% percentile 9.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 30.7% 30.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 42.3% 42.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 21.5% 21.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 21.4% 21.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 15.9% 15.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 42.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 30.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 4.0% Horn Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst