Keyword summary
33%2 analyzed articles/videos1,000 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supervisors results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 352 hits. Analysis detected 2,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,000 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (25,053 of 35,932 keywords). This Supervisors is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Supervisors
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
31%Supervisors (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,000
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510030.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos