Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,480 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Superheroes results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Optimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 621 hits . Analysis detected 2,970 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,920 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (30,262 of 35,665 keywords). This Superheroes is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group. Superheroes
Keyword details
Total words: 5,920
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst