Kids News49%

Going to the movies? Here are some summer blockbusters to watch for 8%

By Kit Hornby0%

6/26/2026, 6:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 145 hits. Analysis detected 1,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 781 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 24.8% and a BS Rank of 8% (20,147 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the article peer group.

It’s a summer of sequels, superheroes and some singing 
Going to a movie theatre can be a pretty fun summer activity. 
It’s air-conditioned, you get to sit for a few hours and there are snacks. 
Plus, summer is usually the time when movie studios put out some of their biggest films. 
There’s even a special name for them: summer blockbusters. 
Rachel Ho, a film critic with Exclaim!, says that traditionally, summer blockbusters are movies that studios think will appeal to the most people, and thus, make the most money. 
Amil Niazi, a pop culture writer and columnist, says summer blockbusters are “fun and joyful.” 
They also often have big action scenes and big stars. 
Both of them spoke with CBC Kids News about some of the summer movies that kids might be interested in seeing this summer. 
Superhero movies 
Superhero movies have often been popular at the box office, and this summer there are two big ones to watch for. 
Supergirl is set in the DC Universe and focuses on Kara Zor-El, or Supergirl. 
She is the cousin of Clark Kent, better known as Superman, and has similar powers. 
She made a brief appearance at the end of 2025’s Superman, when she was revealed to be the owner of Krypto, the super-powered dog Superman had been caring for throughout the movie. 
Ho said the movie was “a lot darker” than she expected, but also said it was “a great origin story,” and that she would have really enjoyed it as a preteen. 
It comes out today. 
Spider-Man: Brand New Day is the latest entry into the Marvel Cinematic Universe and the sequel to 2021’s Spider-Man: No Way Home. 
It follows Peter Parker and his quest to protect New York City as Spider-Man after Dr. 
Strange erased his identity at the end of the previous movie. 
It comes out on July 31. 
Both films are rated PG-13, which means that it’s recommended that you see it with a parent or guardian if you are 12 or under. 
Animated, kid-friendly films 
Two big animated franchises, Minions and Toy Story, also have new movies coming out this summer. 
In Minions & Monsters, the Minions are trying to make a monster movie in 1930s Hollywood. 
It comes out on July 1, which Ho says will probably help it be successful, since most people have the day off for Canada Day and families will be looking for an activity they can do together. 
Toy Story 5, which came out June 19, is about Woody, Buzz Lightyear and the rest of their toy friends facing off against a tablet given to their young owner. 
Niazi said Toy Story 5 is likely to “please the whole crowd,” because it appeals to both kids and their parents who grew up with the original films. 
WATCH  Why Hollywood loves movie sequels even if critics don’t 
She also says sequel movies like these tend to be popular with kids because the characters and worlds are familiar to them from previous films. 
And some wildcards 
Some movies that might not be on your radar could do well at the box office. 
Niazi and Ho both say they think Coyote vs. 
Acme could be a surprise hit. 
The film, which comes out on Aug. 28, is about Wile E. 
Coyote, best known for the many Looney Tunes shorts he co-stars in with the Road Runner. 
In the movie, he’s suing the Acme company for the many injuries their products have caused him. 
Both experts said that because Looney Tunes have been around so long, adults have fond memories of the cartoons and kids also enjoy them, which makes the movie a good choice for families to watch together. 
A live-action version of Moana is also set to hit theatres on July 10. 
It follows the same plot as the original animated Moana movie that came out in 2016. 
While a lot of live-action film adaptations have done well at the box office, like 2025’s Lilo & Stitch and How to Train Your Dragon, they aren’t always a hit. 
The 2025 live-action Snow White film received mixed reviews and didn’t make a lot of money. 
‘Mama, she's Black!': Kids reacting to Little Mermaid trailer go viral 
When the trailer for Moana came out last year, the response was not positive. 
Niazi said she’s not particularly excited about Moana, since the original film “is so recent.” 
Ho says studios see live-action adaptations of previously popular films as a way to make money from kids. 
“If we get them now, they'll buy the merchandise, and we'll get them for future franchises,” she said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.6%Kit Hornby: 1.9%CBC: 2.6%Confirmation Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.3%Kit Hornby: 6.8%CBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic11.3%This article: 8.8%Kit Hornby: 2.2%CBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic8.8%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Kit Hornby: 0.9%CBC: 4.2%Framing Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.1%Kit Hornby: 4.7%CBC: 4.0%Optimism Bias9.1%This article: 1.9%Kit Hornby: 0.5%CBC: 1.4%Pessimism Bias1.9%This article: 9.1%Kit Hornby: 2.7%CBC: 5.7%Negativity Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Kit Hornby: 0.6%CBC: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error2.3%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Kit Hornby: 2.8%CBC: 3.6%Halo Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.0%Kit Hornby: 2.2%CBC: 1.2%Recency Bias7.0%This article: 1.0%Kit Hornby: 0.3%CBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.7%Kit Hornby: 0.9%CBC: 3.7%Appeal to Authority3.7%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 18.6%Kit Hornby: 8.7%CBC: 4.8%Hasty Generalization18.6%This article: 1.4%Kit Hornby: 0.4%CBC: 0.2%Red Herring1.4%This article: 4.7%Kit Hornby: 1.2%CBC: 0.6%Bandwagon4.7%This article: 3.7%Kit Hornby: 0.9%CBC: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion3.7%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.7%Kit Hornby: 1.2%CBC: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.7%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.9%Kit Hornby: 1.5%CBC: 3.3%Anecdotal5.9%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.9%Kit Hornby: 0.5%CBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.9%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.3%Kit Hornby: 0.6%CBC: 1.1%Unattributed Quote2.3%This article: 4.7%Kit Hornby: 1.2%CBC: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection4.7%This article: 7.6%Kit Hornby: 1.9%CBC: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice7.6%This article: 0.5%Kit Hornby: 0.1%CBC: 2.4%Indoctrination0.5%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kit Hornby: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Kit Hornby: 1.2%CBC: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.9%

781 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers31%attributed speech542writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRachel Ho • 29 words • 100.0% coverageAmil Niazi • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageCBC Kids News • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageRachel Ho • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageRachel Ho • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageAmil Niazi • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageAmil Niazi • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAmil Niazi • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRachel Ho • 18 words • 100.0% coverageRachel Ho • 18 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Amil Niazi

100%flagged-word coverage
83 attributed words35% of attributed speech46% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Quote-first Misdirection+14.0 ptsWriter: 4.1%Amil Niazi: 18.1%18.1%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.0 ptsWriter: 7.0%Amil Niazi: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%Amil Niazi: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-0.7 ptsWriter: 0.7%Amil Niazi: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.