Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video970 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sunset Park results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 637 hits. Analysis detected 4,223 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,589 of 37,536 keywords). This Sunset Park is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
Sunset Park
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
70%Sunset Park (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,880
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510069.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos