Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 4,169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Substantive Due Process results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 2,897 hits . Analysis detected 16,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,774 of 37,536 keywords). This Substantive Due Process is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Substantive Due Process
Keyword details
Total words: 16,676
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles16.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst