Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Submarines results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 1,167 hits. Analysis detected 5,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,896 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,304 of 37,536 keywords). This Submarines is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Submarines
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
41%Submarines (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,896
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

41% percentile
025507510040.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.9%16.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate