Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Walkout results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 1,629 hits. Analysis detected 10,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,629 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (19,588 of 35,648 keywords). This Student Walkout is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Student Walkout
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
46%Student Walkout (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,629
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510045.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.9%16.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos