Keyword summary
⁠31%2 analyzed articles/videos873 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Engagement results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 371 hits. Analysis detected 1,819 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,492 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (39,223 of 58,189 keywords). This Student Engagement is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Student Engagement
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠33%Student Engagement (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,492
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510032.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos