Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Stuart Adams results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 356 hits . Analysis detected 2,899 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,704 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,833 keywords). This Stuart Adams is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Stuart Adams
Keyword details
Total words: 4,704
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst