Keyword summary
95%1 analyzed article/video676 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strom Thurmond results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 359 hits. Analysis detected 2,924 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,009 of 34,832 keywords). This Strom Thurmond is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Strom Thurmond
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
72%Strom Thurmond (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,028
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

71% percentile
025507510071.3% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.1%12.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos