Keyword summary
25%3 analyzed articles/videos3,511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strategic Reserves results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 1,356 hits. Analysis detected 11,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,505 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (32,309 of 35,108 keywords). This Strategic Reserves is better (less manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Strategic Reserves
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
8%Strategic Reserves (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 17,505
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

8% percentile
02550751008.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos