Keyword summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strange New Worlds results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.9% saturation with 1,105 hits . Analysis detected 3,295 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,808 of 37,536 keywords). This Strange New Worlds is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. Strange New Worlds
Keyword details
Total words: 2,640
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.9% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 41.9% 41.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 16.8% 16.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 41.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% No True Scotsman: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.3% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst