Keyword summary
88% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Jobs results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 1,077 hits . Analysis detected 5,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,365 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,524 of 37,536 keywords). This Steve Jobs is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Steve Jobs
Keyword details
Total words: 5,365
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.0% percentile 3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst