Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Marche results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 2,034 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,701 of 37,536 keywords). This Stephen Marche is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Stephen Marche
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
72%Stephen Marche (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,848
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510071.5% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 16.2%16.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos