Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Handy results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 3,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,103 of 37,536 keywords). This Stephen Handy is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Stephen Handy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
15%Stephen Handy (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,420
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

15% percentile
025507510014.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos