Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Stella Wasserman results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 751 hits . Analysis detected 5,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,832 keywords). This Stella Wasserman is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Stella Wasserman
Keyword details
Total words: 3,204
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 20.9% 20.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.4% 23.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst