Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stefan Pildes results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 62.8% saturation with 977 hits . Analysis detected 3,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,323 of 37,536 keywords). This Stefan Pildes is worse (more manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group. Stefan Pildes
Keyword details
Total words: 1,556
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.5% percentile 11.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 62.8% 62.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 50.1% 50.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 39.0% 39.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Keyword 62.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 50.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 39.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 25.8%, sitewide 26.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst