Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These State Street Financial Select Sector Spdr Etf results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 51.5% saturation with 614 hits. Analysis detected 2,062 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This State Street Financial Select Sector Spdr Etf is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
State Street Financial Select Sector Spdr Etf
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 51.5%51.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Keyword 51.5%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos